Current:Home > Contact-us10 Senators Call for Investigation into EPA Pushing Scientists Off Advisory Boards-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
10 Senators Call for Investigation into EPA Pushing Scientists Off Advisory Boards
View Date:2024-12-24 00:40:32
A group of Senate Democrats is calling for an expanded investigation into efforts by the Trump Environmental Protection Agency to effectively push independent scientists off key EPA advisory boards and replace them with scientists from the fossil fuel and chemical industries.
In a letter sent to the Government Accountability Office on Thursday, the 10 senators asked the GAO to investigate a new directive, issued by EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Oct. 31, that restricts any scientist who has received EPA funding from serving on the agency’s scientific advisory panels.
Pruitt said the move was intended to clear up conflicts of interest and to rid advisory panel members of financial ties to the agency. But scientific groups, academics and advocacy organizations have all pointed out that it will mean the most experienced scientists—whose qualifications earn them government grants in the first place—will no longer be able to serve in these roles.
“The double-standard is striking: an academic scientist that receives an EPA grant for any purpose cannot provide independent advice on a completely different subject matter on any of EPA’s science advisory boards,” the senators wrote, “while industry scientists are presumed to have no inherent conflict even if their research is entirely funded by a company with a financial stake in an advisory board’s conclusions.”
Five days after Pruitt issued the directive, The Washington Post reported that he appointed 66 new members to advisory panels, many of them with ties to industries the agency regulates. Several panel members stepped down.
“Under this new policy, EPA will be replacing representatives of public and private universities including Harvard, Stanford, Ohio State University, and the University of Southern California with scientists who work for Phillips 66, Total, Southern Company, and the American Chemistry Council,” the senators wrote.
In response to a request for comment, an EPA spokesperson replied: “The Administrator has issued a directive which clearly states his policy with regard to grantees.” The agency did not respond to questions about whether new members will be required to sign conflict of interest declarations or undergo a review process.
Earlier this year, the EPA said it would not renew the terms of members of its broader Board of Scientific Counselors, and beyond EPA, the administration has allowed other scientific boards to expire altogether. In August, the acting head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) told members of an advisory panel for the National Climate Assessment that it would allow the panel’s charter to lapse.
The recent Pruitt directive is similar to legislation long pushed by Republicans in Congress, including a bill introduced earlier this year called the EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act.
Science organizations have pointed out that anyone receiving a federal grant undergoes a merit review, which scrutinizes their professional standards and ethics, and that grant applicants have to declare they have no conflicts of interest before receiving government grants.
“EPA’s decisions have real implications for the health and well-being of Americans and in some cases people worldwide,” wrote Chris McEntee, the executive director of the American Geophysical Union. “By curtailing the input of some of the most respected minds in science, Pruitt’s decision robs the agency, and by extension Americans, of a critically important resource.”
The senators’ letter on Thursday follows a previous request to the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, to investigate the EPA’s policies and procedures related to advisory panels.
veryGood! (19565)
Related
- Homes of Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelce burglarized, per reports
- Too Hot to Handle's Francesca Farago Flashes Her Massive 2-Stone Engagement Ring
- Today’s Climate: July 28, 2010
- Second woman says Ga. Republican Senate candidate Herschel Walker paid for abortion
- Cavaliers' Darius Garland rediscovers joy for basketball under new coach
- WWE Wrestling Champ Sara Lee's Cause of Death Revealed
- Flash Deal: Get 2 It Cosmetics Mascaras for Less Than the Price of 1
- Emma Chamberlain Shares Her Favorite On-The-Go Essential for Under $3
- Spirit Airlines cancels release of Q3 financial results as debt restructuring talks heat up
- Unemployment aid applications jump to highest level since October 2021
Ranking
- How Alex Jones’ Infowars wound up in the hands of The Onion
- Trump informed he is target of special counsel criminal probe
- Children's hospitals grapple with a nationwide surge in RSV infections
- Cities Maintain Green Momentum, Despite Shrinking Budgets, Shifting Priorities
- 'Bizarre:' Naked man arrested after found in crawl space of California woman's home
- Solar Thermal Gears Up for a Comeback
- The Mystery of the Global Methane Rise: Asian Agriculture or U.S. Fracking?
- In close races, Republicans attack Democrats over fentanyl and the overdose crisis
Recommendation
-
Bill on school bathroom use by transgender students clears Ohio Legislature, heads to governor
-
Today’s Climate: Juy 17-18, 2010
-
Aliso Canyon Released 97,000 Tons of Methane, Biggest U.S. Leak Ever, Study Says
-
Anti-Eminent Domain but Pro-Pipelines: A Republican Conundrum
-
Asian sesame salad sold in Wegmans supermarkets recalled over egg allergy warning
-
GM to Be First in U.S. to Air Condition Autos with Climate Friendly Coolant
-
How an on-call addiction specialist at a Massachusetts hospital saved a life
-
Isle of Paradise 51% Off Deal: Achieve and Maintain an Even Tan All Year Long With This Gradual Lotion